Skip to main content

1am writing jam session

I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it.
- Terry Pratchett

I think this quote is useful in describing the difference between Analytical Philosophy and Oridinary Language Philosophy. Most of the Analytics try to look outside of human experience (into the realm of metaphysics) in order to explain human experience (this raises some questions about our ability to explain anything outside the realm of humanity).

But one of the main strategies for Ordinary Language Philosophers (Austin, Wittgenstein, Cavell) is turning our attention back to, borrowing a term from Cavell, the "everydayness" of life; looking for things that are already there, things that we have simply overlooked in our haste.

This is, of course, a reduction of many of the great Analytics, and of the Oridinary Language Philosophers, but I think Pratchett is on to something.

Comments

  1. Aaron12:22 PM

    First, I have to say that I'm not a fan of this new Blogger beta thing ... it totally screwed up the nice layout I had before....

    Anyway, I have to take issue with your characterization of analytic philosophers. The trend of analytic philosophy for the past century has been to a great extent linguistic; its tendency to look outside human experience is not metaphysical, but obsessively logical. Off the top of my head, I would say that the difference between analytic philosophy and ordinary language philosophy is analogous to the difference between langue and parole.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

: . : ::. . . . ........::;. : ; ; .........................

Hmm.... I'm considering applying for the Honors Thesis program. It's a year long (2 semester) program for seniors. It's basically just another class in one's schedule, except you meet with your faculty advisor (of whom you choose), read a lot, and write a lot. Requirements: 3.7 major gpa, 3.5 career gpa and all pre-requisites finished. Surprisingly, I'm elligible. (I just have to *stay* elligible at this point). However, this would mean foregoing Japan. I won't know about my Japan app for a while, but the more I bury myself in the work of two highly esteemed professors, the more I'd like to attempt an honors thesis with either of them. (And, i'd be done with my major, giving me the time to devote to such a feat). If I don't get into the Japanese Program (40-50% chance) I will definitely apply for the Honors. Other than that, I'm trying to adjust to 6 hour class days, and the 3 hours of reading that follows class. Thank god I have monday and...
5 comments
Read more
and it's still ....raining
Post a Comment
Read more

why can't I be complacent?

"Skepticism about our knowledge of others is typically accompanied by complaceny about our knowledge of ourselves." - Stanley Cavell My latest little aphorism from my gem of a book: The Claim of Reason . However, my problem now is that I'm devoting too much time to this class to keep up with my analysis of 19th century America. Don't get me wrong, I love this stuff. Culture/Politics/Rhetoric...all the things that make people awesome or terrible. But again, when I find myself gerimandering the hours of my days into a very unbalanced map composed of "reading...reading....reading....reading...reading. eat. reading....reading...", I do at times think to myself: life is too short My point: I want (need) to drop Rhetoric of the Guilded Age. The only sad part I can think of...I will still probably attend many of the lectures. Given all these turns of events, I've been uselessly planning my future: Summer : take one rhetoric class (Only one!) to make up fo...
3 comments
Read more